Saturday, March 3, 2007

WTF NASCAR!

What is it with people and NASCAR? It seems to be the only thing the Speed channel actually cares about covering. They even have a countdown to the Nextel Cup series. What is that. Its just a bunch of cars loosely based on cars that you and I drive. They go around in a circle and every now and then they run into each other. I don't see how anyone considers this drama. Once in a while a driver will get pissed off and kick someone else's car and then be fined for it by the Nazis that run NASCAR. Let's talk about that for a second. NASCAR has its roots in the days of moon shining. These beer runner had to have a car that would outrun a cop car, but back in the day there were only a few cars to choose from let alone fast ones. These illegal smugglers of alcoholic delights would do their own engine mods including, boring and stroking and piston head mods. When these smugglers had down time they decided to see who built the faster car so they set to racing. People came to watch eventually, and NASCAR was born. These days NASCAR is putting its foot down on people they think are cheating. These cheaters are using aerodynamic modifications, and fuel additives to create as much speed as possible. They have also implemented restrictor plate racing and other fun killing rules. I think one NASCAR should not exsist as sport, sure the drivers sit in the cars for hours on end and sweat off ten or twelve pounds, but all they do is turn left. NASCAR I also believe has lost sight of its history. It was invented by cheaters let everyone cheat as long as the wheels are covered and the cars are considered stock cars. Let the teams just go balls out no restrictor plates, as much fuel additives as the engine can handle, anything for a victory.

So it is my churches official opinion that NASCAR should not be as popular as it is or a sport for that matter, men should not beat their wives, and sports car street track racing should be the norm.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Another reason to Join my Church

Due to my inexplicable ability to be correct I have devised a way to fix social security. I call it the "Family System." The following essay thingy is unorganized and unrevised so just go for understanding and put the mechanics of the English Language out of your mind.



For decades policy makers have avoided or failed to address the Social Security problem decisively. Now the buck stops here. I have devised a solution that has the ability to withstand the test of time, bring back the nuclear family, and encourage good parenting.
The first step of course is to abolish Social Security as we know it. This new plan calls for the children of the family to support their parents in retirement. When a citizen first enters the work force an account will be set up for the parents of the worker. A small percent of the worker's paycheck will then pay into this account and be made available to the parents upon retirement. The percentage per paycheck should not exceed the expense of one dollar unless the worker wishes to add more to their parent's account.
This system leaves open the question of: What is a parent anyway? The definition of parent for this program will be the adult or adults that live with and provide for he worker until they have completed his or her education and have filed independently on their taxes.
Upon the retirement of the parents, a citizen may sue their parents for the account on the grounds of inadequate expenditure upon development, which includes schooling, medical expenses, and other reasonable expenses one might incur in rearing a child. In the event of a lawsuit a panel will investigate the childhood of the plaintiff and look particularly into the possibility of neglect or abuse. Should the plaintiffs claims be well founded, the account will be awarded as punitive damages. However, if the plaintiff's claims are not extenuating enough, for example:disciplinary actions not amounting to abuse, or other other parenting tactics, the plaintiff will be assessed all legal fees and be forced to pay up to five dollars more a paycheck into their parent's account.
Also upon retirement if the parents feel they have accumulated enough wealth to sustain themselves through retirement, the parents may choose to turn the contents of the account over to their children to do with as they please. Should parents become divorced the retirement account will be given to the primary caregiver and the ousted parent will be forced to pay into their own account.
The amount each worker will pay into their parent's retirement account will vary with the amount of children in the immediate household so as to discourage the rampant proliferation of children.If a household has chosen to adopt, they must first be screened and prove that they are financially and generally secure enough to support a child with the intent to send the child to a state university. A family may not adopt beyond their means in order to garner more sources of income for their account. The same rules apply as above.
If both parents should die, God forbid, before retirement the account will be divided among the remaining children. The same will also be done when eternity finally catches up with both parents.
If an individual does not marry, for one must be married to have children, the individual will be entirely responisible for securing his or her own retirement. After retirement the account may be accessed by the parents and the workers are no longer required to pay into it. As this point the worker may pay into his or her own account.
Organizational issues aside, this plan will encourage the return of a strong nuclear family. With the penalties for poor parenting, parents will be encouraged to provide better opportunities for their children, and now that the retirement account is tied to the ethical treatment of the child, abuse cases will become less frequent. This system will also last because it is not related to the amount of young workers as opposed to retirees. This system shrinks the unit of support to the immediate family and will avoid the pitfalls found in the baby boomer generation; did I just say that? Its true that the money accumulated from a workers check may not be enough to solely support a retired couple, however this encourages savvy investing if not just simple savings. With this plan Americans will know to whom their money is going. With this plan we can start building a stronger America.


Now that wasn't so bad I know you are just itching to see my education reforms, but I'm way too lazy to type it right now so you'll just have to keep hitting refresh until new content comes up.
Let me know what you think e-mail me or comment for further discussion.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

You know what's annoying

People who read your blog and don't comment. Just give me something to read about for Christs sake. I obviously have no life so just copy a wiki page and leave it on my comments i don't care. read an entry I've written and comment on it jeez is there anyone out there if so you must be Retarded because you can't comment!